patching...
Update: Got a news tip? E-mail james.kleimann@patch.com »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Third Place Republican Primary Vote Getter Will Not Run for Council Seat

Rossana Surace made the decision not to run even though the Bergen County Republican Organization, which is tasked with filling the vacancy left by Peter B. Campbell bowing out, would have considered her.

 

In the only contested municipal primary election race in Fort Lee on June 5, Republican candidates for Borough Council Thomas Bennett and Peter B. Campbell, who were running together, easily defeated Rossana Surace, who was running alone.

On the day before the election, Campbell told Patch that if he won, he would probably drop out of the race, and that if Surace won, he would gladly endorse her.

But Surace got just 107 votes to Bennett’s 467 and Campbell’s 468.

Later that week, an official with the Bergen County Election Division told Patch that if Campbell does bow out, the Bergen County Republican Organization (BCRO) has until September to fill the vacancy.

As it turns out, Surace is not going to be the candidate filling that vacancy, although her campaign manager said Surace’s decision not to run was made after she was told she would be considered if she submitted her name to the committee.

“I will not be running for Fort Lee Council,” Surace said in an email. “I will continue to stay active in Fort Lee and in the Republican party. I will fully support the Republican candidates since they are Fort Lee's ticket to much needed change.”

Surace went on to say that Fort Lee is in need of a two-party system “in order to admit that we have problems and to provide constructive ideas to address those problems as part of the governing body.”

“An increase in local property taxes of 17.7 percent in five years is shameful, no matter how the current governing body try to sugarcoat it,” she said. “Further, it is insulting to hear the mayor pat himself on the back for lowering the debt—by refinancing for lower interest rates—when his administration raised our debt to the tune of $70 million in the last five years.”

Surace added, “The only way to stop this train is to ban together and elect officials who admit there are problems that must be addressed immediately.”

One thing, however, is certain: Bennett, 69, a retired postal supervisor who was elected to the Fort Lee Board of Education in 1977, served as president of the board in 1979, but otherwise has never been elected to public office, isn’t going anywhere.

“I didn't run so I could drop out,” Bennett previously told Patch. “I am in it to the end.”

Bennett and whoever his running mate turns out to be will face a tough task in unseating incumbent Fort Lee Councilmen Harvey Sohmer and Joseph Cervieri, Jr. in November’s general election though. The Fort Lee Borough Council has been comprised entirely of Democrats for many years.

Sohmer previously said he was “aggravated at the Republican Party that they do this all the time” but that, in any case, he was “not afraid of who we’re going to run against.”

“They pick and choose, and that’s not the way it’s supposed to be,” Sohmer said. “If you’re picked for the primary, you should be the person that runs.”

Do you think Republicans have a chance this year (or any year for that matter) in Fort Lee? Take our poll below and be sure to elaborate in the comments section.

  • Do you think a Republican can win a municipal election in Fort Lee?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes
        8 (26%)
    • No
        15 (50%)
    • Perhaps if the right candidate came along
        7 (23%)
    • I’m not sure
        0 (0%)
    Total votes: 30
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: BCRO, Republican Party, Rossana Surace, Thomas Bennett, bergen county republican organization, and council candidates

Luca D.

4:27 pm on Thursday, June 14, 2012

Someone needs to change this lady's mind quickly.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Toni M.

1:57 pm on Friday, June 15, 2012

that's stinky cause I was looking forward to the bestest victory party eva!!!!

William Mays

4:33 pm on Thursday, June 14, 2012

I agree with Sohmer, it's almost cheating. They nominate one person and then just pick and choose who they want. Doesn't sound Democratic to me. Good thing they won't elected so it doesn't matter.

Reply
Comment_arrow

CD Cantelli

4:44 pm on Thursday, June 14, 2012

Councilman Sohmer has a short memory. That is exactly the strategy used to get Lautenberg elected. Senator Torricelli resigned in October (a month after the deadline for submitting names for the primary) and the Democrats put Lautenberg's name on the ballot. It never amazes me how when the Democrats do it (even after the deadline), it's Standard Operating Procedure, but if the Republicans do it (legally), Sohmer's "aggravated". It's permitted.

Comment_arrow

William Mays

4:47 pm on Thursday, June 14, 2012

Yeah, but they had a basis back then. Torricelli resigned, he didn't put himself on the primary intending to resign.

Jack B Goode

5:15 pm on Thursday, June 14, 2012

And let's not forget why he resigned, To refresh your memory, he was about to be indicted , so the party bosses made him an offer he couldn't refuse.

Reply
Comment_arrow

William Mays

5:21 pm on Thursday, June 14, 2012

And that has what to do with the issue at hand? We aren't talking about corruption in politics, we're talking about the cheap moves made by the Republican Party.

Comment_arrow

Luca D.

9:13 pm on Thursday, June 14, 2012

We are talking about the fact that Sohmer is aggravated by the same stunt that the democrats abused in the past during a US Senate race. Double standard.

Comment_arrow

William Mays

9:28 pm on Thursday, June 14, 2012

How did they abuse it? They had a just reason to do that, were they supposed to stay out of the election? Peter Campbell hasn't been indicted, so he doesn't need to step aside, but it doesn't matter, because they won't win anyway.

Comment_arrow

CD Cantelli

11:22 am on Friday, June 15, 2012

Torricelli wasn't indicted and it was past the statutory date for the deadline when Lautenberg did it.

Tom

8:32 am on Saturday, June 16, 2012

The Democrats have been in total power since 1997 whe Republican Councilwoman Joan Voss switched to the Democrats. Without a winning election since 1997, it is difficult to find candidates who want to run against the Democrats. As of 2008, there was 16,838 registered voters. There were 7,457 or 44.3% Democrats. There was 2,318 Republicans or 13.8%. There was 7,056 unaffiliated or 41.9%.

The numbers clearly favor the Democrats, in order to win, the Republicans need all the unaffiliated voters to support them. Something like that happened in 1997. Instead of being negative, do something to change things.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Toni M.

10:32 am on Saturday, June 16, 2012

I guess that's why the dems think they can do whatever they want and feed us a line of bull.

Leave a comment