Fort Lee Voters Say ‘Yes’ This Time, $30M Referendum Passes
The plan resoundingly approved Tuesday comes with $9.7M from the state and at a cost to the average homeowner of about $103 a year.
Fort Lee voters Tuesday approved the Fort Lee Board of Education’s third school bond referendum since September 2010 by a margin of more than 500 votes.
In unofficial results, the tally was 1,383 votes in favor of the $30.2 million referendum, and just 865 opposing the measure, with a small number of provisional ballots outstanding that Borough Clerk Neil Grant said wouldn’t be nearly enough to change the outcome.
That positive outcome—after two failed attempts at getting larger referendums passed in 2010—authorizes the school district to raise funds through the sale of bonds to finance boiler replacements, roof replacements, science lab renovations at Fort Lee High School and Lewis F. Cole Middle School, masonry repairs and other infrastructure renovations across the district that school officials have called “critical.”
It will also alleviate to a lesser extent some of the overcrowding plaguing the school system, at least at the middle school, where classroom space will be added.
“It’s a great moment for our community and the children of our community,” said board president Arthur Levine at Borough Hall Tuesday evening. “And thank you, voters of Fort Lee, for giving our children a brighter future tomorrow.”
Levine also thanked the Fort Lee Mayor and Council, other groups and associations, including the United Homeowners and the PTAs, for their support, and said the members of the school board “worked very hard and diligently” to get the job done.
“[Interim Superintendent] Steve Engravalle did an outstanding job and is joined by [Business Administrator] Cheryl Balletto,” Levine added. “These people worked hundreds of hours beyond even their own regular work load. Because of that and everybody’s efforts, the children of our borough will have a better future.”
Engravalle called it a “terrific day in the Fort Lee community.”
“We’re just pleased that we’re going to be able to make the repairs and move the district forward the way we know we need to do and provide the best education possible that our children deserve,” Engravalle said. “This is now many years in the making, and I’m humbled by the experience, humbled by the response from the voters, and we certainly will continue to move the district forward and do everything that we have to do to keep Fort Lee as an elite school district in New Jersey.”
For Superintendent of Buildings and Grounds Jack Denichilo, the fact that the referendum passed means that “now the real work begins,” as Engravalle put it.
“But it’s good work,” Denichilo said. “The taxpayers of Fort Lee did the right thing by the kids. We’re looking forward to getting this done.”
School board vice president Linda McCue said the outcome was “a win for our kids.”
“We worked hard; a lot of people came together,” McCue said. “I’m happy the community finally did what was right for our kids, and now we can move forward and at least take care of some of the problems. There’s more to be done, but one step at a time.”
Below is a breakdown of Tuesday’s results by election district:
| Election District | YES | NO |
| 1 | 90 | 106 |
| 2 | 63 | 51 |
| 3 | 60 | 72 |
| 4 | 69 | 28 |
| 5 | 60 | 80 |
| 6 | 95 | 62 |
| 7 | 252 | 96 |
| 8 | 35 | 26 |
| 9 | 52 | 53 |
| 10 | 93 | 53 |
| 11 | 66 | 20 |
| 12 | 49 | 19 |
| 13 | 38 | 18 |
| 14 | 32 | 12 |
| 15 | 35 | 28 |
| 16 | 77 | 38 |
| 17 | 25 | 10 |
| 18 | 27 | 36 |
| 19 | 114 | 21 |
| Absentee | 51 | 36 |
| Total | 1,383 | 865 |
Grant said Wednesday that there were five provisional ballots, three in favor and two opposed to the measure, and that the county still has to certify the election results.
Voter turnout Tuesday was about 12 percent.
Background
The referendum, which was significantly scaled-back from the previous two in 2010, comes with nearly $10 million in state grant funding, which would have been lost to the district had the referendum failed again. But it includes mostly infrastructure repairs and upgrades school officials have emphasized are absolutely necessary.
The school district will in fact receive $9,775,611 in state aid—about 33 percent of the overall cost of the project. The local share is $20,430,466; the tax impact is estimated at $103 a year on an “average assessed home” valued at $468,436.
Below is a rundown of the school-by-school work those taxpayer dollars will now pay for:
- Fort Lee School No. 1 – HVAC system upgrades, roof replacement and window replacement at a total cost of about $3.2 million, with nearly $1.3 million coming from the state
- Fort Lee School No. 3 – Window replacement, masonry repair and repainting at a total cost of $915,000, $366,000 of which would come in the form of state aid
- Fort Lee School No. 4 – Masonry wall repair and repainting, HVAC system upgrades, electrical service upgrades and roof replacement at a total cost of slightly more than $5 million, of which about $2 million would come from the state
- Fort Lee High School – Science lab renovations, HVAC system upgrades, roof replacement, masonry wall repair and repainting at a total cost of about $6.7 million, with roughly $2.7 million coming in the form of state aid
- Lewis F. Cole Middle School – Media center, classroom and entry addition adding 15,250 square feet (including five new classrooms), classroom and music classroom renovations (a total of seven renovated classrooms), HVAC system upgrades and roof replacement and at a total cost of a little more than $14.3 million, with $3.4 million from the state
Critics had argued that in tough economic times, asking taxpayers to help foot the bill was asking too much, but school officials countered that it was the district’s last chance to receive the $9.7 million in state aid, that construction costs are lower now than they’ve been in years, that interest rates are also at historic lows and that voting ‘yes’ was an investment in Fort Lee’s school children and the community itself.
Fort Lee Mayor Mark Sokolich and each member of the Borough Council came out in full, public support of the referendum this time around, unlike in 2010. The referendum also garnered support from members of the United Homeowners Association of Fort Lee—support the school board did not enjoy when the plan was much more expensive and included a new school. The Korean Parent Advisory Council (KPAC), Korean American Association of Fort Lee (KAAFL) and PTA leaders and parents also lobbied hard in support of the referendum.
In mid-December 2010, local voters defeated a much bigger proposal to upgrade and expand the borough's school system for the second time in three months. The school board had originally presented a $99 million plan that September, but voters turned it down by a margin of just 54 votes, 1,651 to 1,597.
The second plan reduced the cost to $89 million, but the final tally that time around was 2,034 votes opposed to the measure, and just 1,357 in favor.
School board president Arthur Levine said in December that school officials were “mindful of every dollar” and recognized “the difficult economic circumstances.”
But he also said, “We need to get this done.”
“There is no greater insurance than having strong schools for your real estate values,” Levine said. “And most importantly, our kids need it. We need to keep them competitive. They don’t have the years anymore to wait. We’ve put it off for long enough. There has been virtually nothing done; now’s the time.”
Steven Engravalle, Interim Superintendent of the Fort Lee Public Schools
2:04 pm on Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Dear Friends, Colleagues, and Community Members,
The time is now.
Today, the voters of Fort Lee will decide on the $30.2 million in desperately needed repairs to our schools. If approved, this vote will fix the cold classrooms, leaking roofs, cracked boilers, burning motors, drafty windows, and much of the general state of disrepair of our schools, thus allowing us to enhance our programs and afford the children of Fort Lee the quality educational opportunities they deserve.
Caring and not caring are contagious. I ask each of you as members of the Fort Lee community: please remember to vote tonight from 2:00 – 9:00 p.m. I also implore you to remind your friends and neighbors to vote as well. Regardless of your vote, by your actions and words today, show your friends and neighbors that you care about our community, and they will care too.
Lastly, I remind you that the only way to succeed in anything is to give everything. If, like me, you are tired of cold classrooms, leaking roofs, cracked boilers, burning motors, drafty windows, and the general state of disrepair of our schools, all I ask is that you do all you can. Speak up today, for I fear what we fail to say today will be deafening for the future of our schools and the future of the children of Fort Lee.
We all count and count on each other; the time is now.
With Fort Lee Pride,
Mr. Steven Engravalle
Interim Superintendent of Schools
EngravaS@FortLee-BOE.net
Anna
2:54 pm on Tuesday, January 24, 2012
I hope that Mr Engravalle's message gets across. But we all need to give it a push! Call and text your neighbors and friends and get them out to vote! Turnout of parents, in particular, is going to mean everything today.
Anna
6:02 pm on Tuesday, January 24, 2012
That allegation has absolutely nothing to do with the need to make repairs in the schools. Shame on you for raising it. Further the board of ed not the superintendent would control the funds with a strict capital budget
milton McC
7:04 am on Thursday, January 26, 2012
You know very little about how schools work. EVERYTHING with the exception of a few appointments of certain board professionals is done ONLY with the recommendation of the superintendent
Robert M Garcia
6:03 pm on Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Again I ask why are the polls not opened earlier in the day. Those of us who start work in the afternoon are unable to vote.
Keith Jensen
6:26 pm on Tuesday, January 24, 2012
The schools need to be fixed. In fact, they need to be expanded. While this needed band-aid for our ailing schools will help, it is far short of what is necessary.
Hopefully, the effect on school population of the new buildings being allowed to be developed in town are fully vetted, unlike 100 Old Palisades with its 255 apartments that sent a surplus of children to School #1, M.S. and H.S.
The Mayor and Council were absent from the 1st and 2nd attempt to pass the referendum. Were they against it then? If so, they should have said it. They are for it now, only because of the community being so vocal about it.
Notwithstanding the failed leadership of the Mayor and Council with respect to the education system in town, more importantly the Board of Ed is fully responsible for putting us all in the uncomfortable position we are now in.
Consider the boilers and roofs at a minimum. Everyone knows they have a lifespan. So, when that time comes up, which that day of reckoning has, we should have a reserve.
Guess what. No reserve, but School Board did just give the former Superintendent a $50K bonus for leaving the school system early for what I understand, cashing in his unused sick days.
Al Norton and Martha Cohen have been phenomenal supporters of this community along with those that are mentioned in the below letter to the Borough.
A FL advocate, Howard Pearl takes it home in his posting here:
http://fortlee.patch.com/blog_posts/pearls-of-wisdom-91d4d765
milton McC
7:07 am on Thursday, January 26, 2012
The mayor ad council are SUPPOSED to not be involved in the BOE. They are a independent governing body for a reason.
Tracy Mattei
9:41 am on Thursday, January 26, 2012
M Mc--- The Mayor and Town council are not part of the decision making, that is ludicrous ...HOWEVER, the support of community leaders such as the Mayor and Town Council is imperative for progress. Their influence is invisible, permeates personal and cultural agendas; it isfar reaching and invaluable to the children of Fort Lee.
Anna
7:02 pm on Tuesday, January 24, 2012
One has to assume the polls are not open all day because of the cost. That's another thing the penny punchers in town complain about
milton McC
7:08 am on Thursday, January 26, 2012
It is also a way to limit the number of people voting.. They count on the "faithful" to come out. The PTAs are rallied as well as other "support" groups. Understand, they don't want you to vote.
Tracy Mattei
9:43 am on Thursday, January 26, 2012
There is one caveat to that assumption, slightly more people voted in this referendum than in April for the BOE election and budget..............
Tracy Mattei
7:14 pm on Tuesday, January 24, 2012
If memory serves me correct, the polls were opened all day for one school based election and the numbers were no different, I guess its ROI for added cost and I am sure the Dept of Elections has regulations as well.
Robert M Garcia
8:04 pm on Tuesday, January 24, 2012
The last referendum was on Apr 27 to approve the school budget by 55 million. The Original bill/Vote was not passed in Nov. when the polls were opened all day to all voters. To get around this because obviously we were all wrong the first time a special referendum vote was held on april 27. The hours were only from 2pm to 9pm and the bill was only passed by three votes. So I think that it does matter what time the polls open and close. I also dont think it has anything to do with cost but is specifically planned that way to eliminate certain votership.
Tracy Mattei
8:46 pm on Tuesday, January 24, 2012
I should have been a little more specific, I was referring to several years ago, not recently......there are always absentee ballots, so the issue is not of exclusion but of choice.
Robert M Garcia
9:06 pm on Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Alls I know is that in a normal election the voters are given the entire day. And their is a reason for that. I am not an absentee voter and should not have to cast one to be heard. I should be able to get up in the morning and cast my vote.
Tracy Mattei
10:25 pm on Tuesday, January 24, 2012
There is legislation that will move the school based elections to November in the general elections. This will be a full day. Until that is settled and ironed out, the absentee ballot is your only option.......
David Sarnoff
10:15 pm on Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Congratulations Fort Lee for passing the Referendum. Thanks to all the voters, Board of Education, Administration, Mayor & Council, PTAs, Homeowners Association, KPAC and all the many volunteers who got the word out. We will now be able to upgrade our infrastructure and bring our science labs into the 21st century.
Tracy Mattei
7:45 am on Wednesday, January 25, 2012
Good job Dave. What a a relief....finally!!!!
Anna
10:55 pm on Tuesday, January 24, 2012
hallelujah! for once we can be proud to have done the right thing. thanks to all those involved!
Al Norton
11:42 pm on Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Driving up from South Jersey I got to cast my vote at 8:55 at Moore House.Thanks to all manning polls for your hard work.
Howard L. Pearl
12:09 am on Wednesday, January 25, 2012
Thank you Fort Lee voters for finally showing that we are a caring community, with responsible citizens and that apathy does not have to rule. Let's use this positive attitude to now move forward into the future.
Special thanks to Mr. Engravalle and the BOE for their dedication to this project, to the Mayor and Council who showed their unilateral support, and kudos to all those active community members who were so instrumental in the success of this endeavor.
Tracy Mattei
7:45 am on Wednesday, January 25, 2012
Good job Howard. There is a little hope restored for me, a little faith that we can come together as a community and make things just a little bit better.
Robert M Garcia
12:47 am on Wednesday, January 25, 2012
Doesnt matter Tracy, If the votes dont go the way they want it to they'll just keep holding referendums until they do!
Tracy Mattei
7:44 am on Wednesday, January 25, 2012
RMG- Of course they would have always continued until they designed a program that was approved by the public. The schools are in disrepair and overcrowded, and we left a lot of grant money on the table. The facts don't change because of a voted down referendum....it would have been a crime if they hadn't. If you feel strongly enough, and know that you cannot make the voting times, you do have an option, mail in ballots--- almost 100 people took advantage of this process for yesterday's vote.
Anna
10:47 am on Wednesday, January 25, 2012
And thanks to everyone at Med West! I have no doubt that we were responsible for the excellent turnout in District 7!
Zachary David
11:59 am on Wednesday, January 25, 2012
Is there a map or database available on the web that identifies what district various locations in Fort Lee are assigned to? It looks like districts 1, 3, 5, 9 and 18 were the only ones with a majority voting against the referendum. I'd be curious to see if that sheds a light on which populations were opposed. It amazes me that they can flip their middle finger to the schools even when the need is so obvious and the cost impact so modest.
William Mays
2:56 pm on Wednesday, January 25, 2012
I live in District 3 and I was surprised at the results. I voted for it and my neighbors did as well. As you guys know, I was against the prior two referendums. If a person like myself can go out and vote for it, I don't see why the rest of the people here can't, considering their wealth.
Tracy Mattei
12:06 pm on Wednesday, January 25, 2012
http://www.fortleenj.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=98&Itemid=150
Page down on this webpage and you can access the PDF.
I am from 5 and a little surprised myself, especially because I paid taxes for all their kids to go through the schools long before I had kids!!! Its part of our responsibilities as home owners and Americans.
Ray Dominguez
5:40 pm on Wednesday, January 25, 2012
Where was the Fort Lee Board of Education during these past years when these "repairs" and "upgrades" could have been done over the due course of time. Guess that's Fort Lee politics for you. Wait until the situation becomes intolerable, then scramble, instead of planning ahead.
Tracy Mattei
7:37 pm on Wednesday, January 25, 2012
Precisely Ray! politics have played a part in education for too long...........
Ray Dominguez
6:25 pm on Wednesday, January 25, 2012
In response to Zachary's comment, the Democrats in Fort Lee and the Board of Ed. have been "Flipping their middle finger" to most, if not all, of the residents. Why do you think we pay high taxes and see very little in return? Can anyone say CORRUPTION?
Tracy Mattei
9:07 am on Thursday, January 26, 2012
nah, this group doesn't do that. atleast 7 out of 9 do care about why they are there.
Snake Plissken
7:45 pm on Wednesday, January 25, 2012
Valid points Ray, but the fact remains that the children of today should not have to suffer for the corruption and ineptitude of days past. That's democracy, for better or worse, when it comes to who gets elected and re-elected, the voters get exactly what they deserve. If they're dumb enough to re-elect a terrible leader because he's from the right political party or because he's the incumbent, or if they're dumb enough to toss out a an incumbent who's actually doing a good job, then so be it. I think it was Churchill who once said that the best argument against democracy is to spend five minutes talking to the average voter. But that's the best system we can come up with so far.
Zachary David
3:55 pm on Thursday, January 26, 2012
Ray; Compared to other similar Bergen County towns, I don't believe that Fort Lee's taxes are notably high. We have a lot of ratables in town (for better or worse) that keep our taxes relatively low. What specifically would you like to see in return for your taxes that you are not getting?
Tracy Mattei
5:53 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012
I have to say, we do get a lot for what we pay. In the town I grew up in the taxes are higher than here and they still have to pay for garbage pick up, recycling and pay a lot more for recreational activities for kids, no senior things etc.
jordan miller
9:14 am on Friday, January 27, 2012
Why was school # 2 not mentioned in the line up of repairs needed? My child is a student at this school and classes are done in hallways and closets. Heat is an issue as well. All the schools are in Great Need of Work. Not enough space and over crowding are the problems in all the schools in Fortlee. How can school #2 be left out? JMiller
Anna
12:27 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012
Jordan: It's obviously triage. When you don't have enough money for everything, you have to address the most urgent needs first. And expansions and efforts to deal with overcrowding were basically off the table with this much-reduced referendum, whichis essentially just for repairs. This while thing will no doubt come back to haunt us, and have to be addressed again in the future, which is why it's such a shame that the larger bond issue was voted down in the first place!
William Mays
7:28 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012
I would have voted for a referendum that had expansions for all of the schools, but I'm not going to vote for a referendum that includes a new school, and especially includes one that is going to be built over a park that was donated specifically for the purpose of being a park and also is a park that I use almost daily in the summer.
Howard L. Pearl
10:34 am on Sunday, January 29, 2012
In response to Jordan: The citizens of Fort Lee defeated the two major referendums. School #2 would have benefited as would all of the schools. By passing this reduced referendum, the town is now relegated to a band-aid approach to repairs and upgrades, with no new classrooms included. With Centuria on the horizon, the highest probability is that the BOE will be forced in a few years to request a new referendum, specifically targeting areas such as School #2 and new classrooms. Getting a 2nd referendum through this community in such a short period of time is going to border on the impossible, unless there is a change in attitude in the population, i.e. until the residents recognize that our children deserve the best possible learning environment.