Fort Lee Likely to Get Red Light Cameras, Mayor Says
Mayor Mark Sokolich said he regrets not taking action sooner on a red light camera enforcement program for the borough, as the NJDOT lifted its temporary suspension of a pilot program in 21 towns.
After recently directing 21 of the 25 municipalities participating in a five-year red light camera pilot program, including neighboring Palisades Park and Englewood Cliffs, to temporarily suspend enforcement and “recertify” the timing of yellow lights, the New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT) this week lifted the suspension.
Meanwhile, Fort Lee Mayor Mark Sokolich said Friday that although it might not prove to be a popular move with plenty of people in Fort Lee having expressed opposition to a red light came enforcement program in the borough, he plans to “revisit” the idea, and that the governing body is likely to move forward on it.
Prefacing his comments by saying that he always tries to make the best decisions for the community regardless of whether they’re difficult or potentially unpopular, Sokolich said he regrets not “dealing with these red light cameras two years ago.”
The NJDOT’s suspension order affected 63 of the 85 authorized red light camera intersections statewide, including Sylvan Avenue and East Palisade Avenue in Englewood Cliffs and four intersections in Palisades Park; towns were directed to temporarily stop issuing summonses based on video evidence, according to state transportation officials, who also said the pilot program legislation specified a formula “to determine the proper duration” of a yellow light that differed from the national standard.
The Cameras didn’t have to be turned off, but each municipality was ordered to have a licensed engineer conduct a traffic analysis to ensure that the length of yellow lights met the minimum time required by law.
The affected municipalities were informed Tuesday that they can resume enforcement and also issue summonses for violations that occurred during the suspension period, officials said.
American Traffic Solutions (ATS), a vendor of red light cameras and a company that pitched its services to the Fort Lee Mayor and Council more than a year ago, issued a statement in response to the NJDOT’s announcement, saying the company was “pleased that [NJDOT] has confirmed what we’ve known all along.”
“All of the approaches monitored by ATS’ red-light safety cameras are now, and have always been in compliance with both state and federal yellow light timing standards,” the ATS statement read in part. “Overall, New Jersey’s red-light safety camera programs have been an overwhelming success.”
In January, the Fort Lee Mayor and Council discussed the possibility of putting out a request for proposals (RFP) for a red light camera program but took no action on the matter.
Sokolich said Friday that the governing body wasn’t “happy with the responses” it got, but that he anticipates it will take action “within the next month or two.”
“And I’m not going to deviate from the course,” Sokolich said, insisting that such an enforcement program isn’t designed “to ticket my own community.”
Instead, the mayor said, it’s designed to make dangerous intersections safer and to generate revenue for the borough, much of which he said will come from non-residents “who are just using [Fort Lee] as a cut-through.”
“Fort Lee is blessed or cursed, depending on how you look at it, with several very, very busy intersections, where, during peak morning and afternoon rush, I would venture to guess that less than 1 percent of the traffic volume is generated by residents from Fort Lee,” Sokolich said.
One example is Route 46 and Fletcher Avenue, although it’s not the only “viable intersection” borough officials would be looking at for red light cameras, according to Sokolich, who estimated that that intersection alone could bring in $100,000 to $200,000 a month.
“And we wouldn’t be picking on our own residents,” Sokolich said. “We would be, quite frankly, dealing with a lot of violators that merely use Fort Lee as a shortcut to the bridge.”
In June, Police Chief Thomas Ripoli said there are “negatives and positives” to red light camera enforcement programs, but that he would defer to the Mayor and Council when it comes to the question of whether to institute such a program in Fort Lee.
For a complete list of the 85 intersections approved for red light camera enforcement in New Jersey, click here.
****
Find us on Facebook or Twitter, or for news straight to your inbox, sign up for our daily newsletter.
William Mays
9:33 pm on Friday, July 27, 2012
Inb4 the Republicans come complaining about how they're always going to get tickets because they suck at driving.
paul berardi
5:54 pm on Saturday, July 28, 2012
We left Fort Lee in 88 and moved to Scottsdale AZ. Red light cameras do create a cash cow for the town but the initial problem of rear end accidents is not worth it. Increase red on times instead!
paul berardi
6:01 pm on Saturday, July 28, 2012
Arizona is putting in traffic circles. You think they might learn from NJ!! NJ should learn not to use traffic cameras!
Jim
8:32 pm on Saturday, July 28, 2012
A 2004 study sponsored by the TX DOT reported: "With one exception, all of the right-angle crashes [they reviewed 40 crashes] occurred after 5 seconds or more of red." (Link at thenewspaper daht com/news/02/243.asp )
A real late runner (5+ secs. late) doesn't do it on purpose. He doesn't know (a lost or distracted visitor) or doesn't remember (a distracted or impaired "local") a camera is up ahead, so the presence of a camera won't stop him. To cut these real late runs and the crashes they cause, identify your most dangerous intersections and improve the visual cues that say, "signal ahead." Florida's DOT found that painting "signal ahead" on the road cut running by up to 74%. Also make these other inexpensive mods: Make the signal lights bigger in dia., add backboards to them, make the street lights brighter, and put up a lighted name sign for the cross street. And if you can afford it, add a signal pole on the NEAR side of the corner.
Cameras have many side effects: They (indirectly) block emergency vehicles - cars stopped at a camera hesitate to get out of the way! Rearenders, local $$$ sent to Oz, AZ or Goldman-Sachs, where it won't come back, and tourists and shoppers driven away.
Want safety, no side effects?
Install the visual cues.
To cut car/pedestrian accidents, train your kids (and yourself) not to step out just 'cuz the walk sign came on.
Who needs cameras?
Who needs their side effects?
Who needs the gullible politicians who OK them?
Thomas A Bennett
10:38 am on Sunday, July 29, 2012
I have been against red light cameras since the Mayor started talking about them in January.In some cases, red light cameras cause rear end accidents. There is no Policeman's discretion, just someone looking at a picture. I am concerned about fire trucks getting through Fort Lee's heavy traffic. If you are sitting at a red light with a camera, are you going to go through the light then, take a day off from work to go to court to explain why you went through that light? If a Policeman was there he could use his discretion and let you move so the fire truck could get to the fire.This is just one scenario where red light cameras make things worse. Red light cameras are just another source of income for the town. It has nothing to do with safety.
Paul Umrichin
10:18 am on Monday, July 30, 2012
If someone wants to make the intersection of Fletcher and 46 more safe the first thing that needs to be done is make sure all the routes leading to it and through it are paved properly, have street painted guides/arrows, and better signs to deter and guide the cars the correct way. Repaving and painting even through that intersection all the way to Historic Park would make that whole section more safe as it is difficult to make out what's left of the street markings and if you aren't familiar with the area the signs can get confusing as to where and when you can go somewhere.
Jimmy Nelson
2:05 pm on Monday, July 30, 2012
according to Sokolich, who estimated that that intersection alone could bring in $100,000 to $200,000 a month....And that's the whole reason why they have them ..not for the public's safety or the idiotic response that its more convenient for the violator to pay ..its all about bleeding the people even more financially, even tough so many people are struggling right now ..and people wonder why politicians are despised !!
William Mays
4:08 pm on Monday, July 30, 2012
Ohhh, I feel so sorry for all of the people who run red lights and have to pay a fine after.
Kooz Emek
4:06 pm on Monday, July 30, 2012
Tax, fee, tax tax, fee. That's what you get from the Dem$ of Fort Lee.
Thomas A Bennett
5:47 pm on Monday, July 30, 2012
I for one have never gone through a red light. The only person I know of who did is Mayor Sokolich who payed an $83 fine. That's where he got the idea from. Sometimes it's not about Democrat or Republican, it's about what is the right thing.
William Mays
6:00 pm on Monday, July 30, 2012
So? He paid the fine, big deal.
Jerry Wish
10:08 am on Tuesday, July 31, 2012
Billy Mays you missed the point, which quite frankly surprises me. Sokolich ran a red light, he violated the law, that's the point.