patching...
Update: Get Fort Lee News, 'Like' Fort Lee Patch on Facebook »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Christie, Engravalle Appear on ‘Morning Joe’ Live from Fort Lee High School

The show, which was broadcast from the high school gym, focused on education reform.

 
0 of 0
Fort Lee Interim Superintendent Steven Engravalle (left) and NJ Gov. Chris Christie appearing as guests on the live MSNBC broadcast of "Morning Joe" at Fort Lee High School Friday, March 2, 2012. Erik Wander
Photos (11)

Photos

Fort Lee Interim Superintendent Steven Engravalle (left) and NJ Gov. Chris Christie appearing as guests on the live MSNBC broadcast of "Morning Joe" at Fort Lee High School Friday, March 2, 2012.
Gov. Chris Christie makes his way into the studio for his appearance on "Morning Joe."
An animated Christie making his point that Democrats and Republicans in New Jersey need to be unlike their counterparts in Washington.
Members of the panel discussion later answered questions from the audience. Pictured here are Gov. Christie, Rev. Al Sharpton, Michelle Rhee and Mike Barnicle.
Gov. Chris Christie and host "Morning Joe" host Mika Brzezinski.

Fort Lee High School was in the national spotlight Friday, when MSNBC broadcast its morning shows, Way Too Early and Morning Joe, live from the high school gymnasium.

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie was one of the featured guests, along with Rev. Al Sharpton, Howard Dean, Michelle Rhee and many others on a show with a special focus on education reform.

Fort Lee Interim Superintendent of Schools Steven Engravalle was the main subject of a pre-recorded piece that aired on both shows, and he also joined Christie, Newark Superintendent of Schools Cami Anderson and Morning Joe hosts Joe Scarborough, Mika Brzezinski and Willie Geist, in a live segment.

Sporting his now trademark Superman socks, which he proudly showed off when asked to do so, Engravalle talked about how Fort Lee schools have improved in the past couple of years.

“I’ve got a tremendous staff,” Engravalle said. “The majority of teachers are tremendous; we’re very, very lucky.”

Attributing Fort Lee’s recent successes in education to “a change of culture,” Engravalle said, “It’s a change of supporting only the superstars and the rock star teachers.”

“Instead of spending the majority of our time on that 5 percent that are the problems, spend your time supporting that 95 percent,” he said. “That’s really what we did.”

Asked by Geist how his experiences as a teacher have informed the way he approaches his role as a superintendent, Engravalle said, “I’m still a teacher.”

“I never wanted to be a superintendent of schools,” he said. “I wanted to be a teacher, and I wanted to be a coach. I stayed late. I came in early. I worked hard for kids.”

Also making a cameo appearance on the morning show in a brief interview with Geist was Fort Lee Mayor Mark Sokolich, who talked about how the high school has “grown” since he graduated in 1981.

“[Engravalle’s] got tremendous energy,” Sokolich said. “We have a very energetic board as well. And I’m on the record as saying, look, if you want to guarantee a good, strong community, you need good, strong schools. The reverse of that is if you don’t have a good district, you’re going to have a weak community, and we want to set the pace here in Bergen County.”

Sokolich said the “biggest change” in local education over the last few years is that “teachers have become a lot more unified.”

“Working together, communicating to the district, communicating with the board, communicating with the students, and it’s been a unified effort, which is important,” Sokolich said.

Other guests on Morning Joe included Mike Barnicle, Harold Ford Jr., Jon Meacham, Randi Weingarten, Gov. Jack Markell, D-Del. and Gov. Dannel Malloy, D-Conn.

But it was the governor of New Jersey who stole the show in the high school gym, railing against teachers’ unions but praising teachers, and touting the increased state aid to schools in his recently unveiled budget.

Christie said teachers deserve a union that is “as good as” they are, and said he’d like to be able to pay top-performing teachers more for “excellence.”

“I’d like to make sure that we don’t guarantee somebody a job after three years and one day even if they’re not performing,” the governor said. “I want you to be held accountable.”

Noting that New Jersey spends more per pupil “than any state in America,” averaging $17,700 per student statewide and in excess of $24,000 in schools in some of the state’s bigger cities, Christie said, “We want accountability in return for that.”

“I want to pay the better teacher more,” he said. “But I also want the liberty to have superintendents like the one you met [Engravalle] and principals to be able to say when a teacher’s not performing we have an objective review process to go through that. And if they don’t improve, and they’re not performing, then they need to go.”

He added, “We shouldn’t be paying people just to occupy space, which in some schools in New Jersey we’re doing.”

The governor also said that teachers’ performance should be evaluated based on improvement and “not a raw score.”

“That’s a fair measure, no matter what child you’re dealing with,” he said. “What every parent wants every year, even for kids who have developmental disabilities [or] other challenges, all they want to see is that their kid reached their maximum potential—improve.”

Asked where he “found the money” to ramp-up education funding for the state, Christie said, “By cutting spending in other places.”

He highlighted his budget, which he said would increase K-12 spending by $213 million.

“It’s now at an all-time high in New Jersey history—$8.8 billion in state aid to K-12 education,” Christie said.

On the subject of successes in education reform, the governor said he hopes the best is yet to come.

“I pray I haven’t had my greatest success yet because we haven’t done enough—nearly enough—yet,” he said. “And I’ve had a lot of resistance. The last two years have been about fights—about fights to try to get people in New Jersey awake to the idea that it is immoral to spend $24,000 per pupil per year in Newark and have kids graduating at a stunningly low rate.”

He also said people in Fort Lee should care about what’s going on in Newark because their tax dollars help pay for education there.

“Ninety-plus percent of the funding that goes to Newark comes from the state income tax,” Christie said.

The show, which producers previously touted as a “special town hall meeting,” did include a roughly 15-minute segment during which Christie, Rhee and Sharpton fielded a total of five questions from members of the by-invitation-only audience.

A 15-year-old girl named Adrienne went off topic, asking the governor why he recently vetoed a bill on gay marriage that was approved by both the state Assembly and Senate.

Christie acknowledged that people in New Jersey have “very different opinions about that,” but said he believes marriage should be “between one man and one woman.”

“So what I’ve said to folks is, after vetoing the bill, let’s put it on the ballot,” Christie said. “If the majority of people in New Jersey want to have same-sex marriage, then vote for it, and I’ll be governed by it. But I don’t think that’s a decision that should be made by 121 people in Trenton alone. It’s a major change in the way we’ve governed our society.”

To view video clips from Friday morning’s broadcast from Fort Lee High School, visit the Morning Joe website.

Related Topics: Al Sharpton, Fort Lee High School, Morning Joe, Morning Joe Show, Msnbc, Way too early, and howard dean

Mark Finocchiaro

9:03 pm on Friday, March 2, 2012

This is a bunch of bull. The Gov is against unions and anybody else that stands in his way. Its funny to see how many people kiss up to him just to improve their image. I'm tired of all the BS, when is somebody going to say what they really think of the Gov or even the Fort Lee School System.

Reply
Comment_arrow

William Mays

11:36 pm on Friday, March 2, 2012

I disagree with Governor Christie on many things, but I can totally agree with him that the unions in NJ are out of control. They have made their sole purpose to protect terrible teachers, and let the other ones be laid off because they are non-tenured. I support his fight against the unions and if he is able to get rid of teacher tenure, he might earn my vote in 2013.

Deb Fein

9:39 pm on Friday, March 2, 2012

I am just going to say one thing here. We have a wonderful Principal at the high school who is all for change, for the better. She has always made a difference in my child's life. Concerning some of your comments about the Governor, Mike, I can not disagree.
The End.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mark Finocchiaro

9:01 am on Saturday, March 3, 2012

Wake up and get out of the cave you live in Deby. My wife was a High School teacher and was assaulted by a student. The student is back in school and my wife is still suffering from the incident. What did the Principal and the school do for her.

Comment_arrow

Deb Fein

3:48 pm on Saturday, March 3, 2012

I can only speak from my own experience, Mark, which has been a positive one. End of Discussion.

Anna

7:33 am on Saturday, March 3, 2012

To focus on the positive, this was a fabulous opportunity to showcase Fort Lee and its school system on a national scale, and does much to offset some of the negative attitudes/impressions that have come with past leadership turnovers, high-profile scandals at the high school and battles over the superintendent selection process. There was much said that people could disagree with, and certainly Christie was the main attraction for a good chunk of the show, but the topic of education reform was covered comprehensively in high-level discussions that went beyond just teacher performance and union. There were two other governors and many other education professionals there. There was discussion of income inequality, low wages and inadequate resources for teachers, how best to address the needs of poorly serviced and performing communities, etc. Although Christie and Engravalle got quite a bit of attention, I think that kids were generally at the center of the discussions. The clips of much of the show are on the Morning Joe website.

Reply

Alan Reeder

10:54 am on Saturday, March 3, 2012

“I never wanted to be a superintendent of schools,” he said. “I wanted to be a teacher, and I wanted to be a coach. I stayed late. I came in early. I worked hard for kids.”

How does a guy who "wanted to be a teacher" quit teaching for an administrative position after less than four years in the classroom. Did he wake up one day and discover he had an MA in Ed. Administration? What a pile of crap. He "worked hard for the kids" but couldn't wait to get out of the classroom. To what extent was the school day disrupted to accomodate a "town hall" where the overwhelming message was to trash teachers (yeah, I know, everyone loves the teachers but hates their union. As if a democratically organized union is somehow separate from its membership.)? Would it have been possible for Morning Joe to actually have one working, union, teacher present to defend the profession from endless ad hominem attacks. Fort Lee taxpayers, ask your new Superintendent if he has further plans to use your children and schools as props for the Governor's agenda driven, political theater.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tracy Mattei

11:27 am on Saturday, March 3, 2012

I do have to ask if you think its fair for a union to spend 30 million dollars on campaign, and not on their union members. Do you think 350k is an appropriate salary for a union leader? He makes more than the governor and the superintendent....
Mr. Engravalle also stated he still views himself as a teacher...

Comment_arrow

William Mays

2:21 pm on Saturday, March 3, 2012

Tracy, exactly my thoughts.

Wonk

12:40 pm on Saturday, March 3, 2012

I watched the segments on MSNBC, and Fort Lee schools did not come across in a positive light at all. Engrevalle, who has been acting superintendent all of a few months arrogantly takes credit for a turning around what is portrayed as a terrible district while completely throwing the teachers under the bus. It was clear he was sucking up to Christie and try to portray himself as the next Michelle Rhee and playing up the ridiculous "superman" baloney. Seems like a lot of the problems with the schools came under his watch as Asst. Supt.

It was substantially disruptive to the students for the school to be used as a prop, and for a "town hall" event it was strange that it was not open to the public at all or announced ahead of time at the BOE meeting.

Reply
Comment_arrow

William Mays

2:22 pm on Saturday, March 3, 2012

The students were allowed to ask questions. I would know, I was in the audience.

Tracy Mattei

6:44 pm on Saturday, March 3, 2012

The Fort Lee schools should not come across in a positive light. We are not in a good place. We are only OK. Mr. Engravalle was the ONLY admistrator who was honest with me about not having an elementary curriculum last year before my run for BOE last year, (when I had been looking and asking for two years). He was the ONLY person who stated that the elementary schools all teach differently with different content....Engravalle is the only one who has been honest with this town....
He is also the person who states very clearly that the ONLY reason we are as good as we are is because of the great teachers and our children!
For too many years this district has been broken, broken at the top. We have been slighted and lied to at every turn, even when we ask direct questions--- So we have a chance to fix this SD from the top down, give our teachers the support and supplies they need! Get rid of the nonsense that general citizens know how to manage an educational system get a straight shooter at the top........let the experts bring us up to date, ready the district for the future and give our children what they deserve!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Wonk

11:27 am on Sunday, March 4, 2012

I am not sure of your point: Engravalle was honest about being an inept administrator? He was truthful that he was powerless as the 2nd ranking school official, and now top dog, to effect any meaningful change? He was forthcoming that he was aware that schools were not operating properly but lacked the leadership or respect to get them to do what they were supposed to? That under his watch the schools slipped to an all time low in achievement?

He has been a big part of the problem you speak of. He is too inexperienced, too arrogant, and too driven by self -promotion to help the children of Fort Lee.

carol simon

7:35 pm on Saturday, March 3, 2012

After watching the recordings Morning Joe which I try to catch everyday before I go across the bridge to a NYC school that may include some of the 5% that is not tolerated by some. I was disappointed that Mrs Church was not included in the discussion about education as she is a master educator and principal. What about some terrific Fort Lee teachers or students that have shown progress but may not be honor students and may indeed be challenged. The buzz word in education is "inclusion." Poverty, diversity, English Language learners and special needs students are expected to meet benchmarks and pass standardized tests in a curriculum that doesn't meet their needs, yet. We have a terrific director of Special Education , Ann Marie Bruder, who has demonstrated courage and capability to bring our challenged students home to FL. There's a story. I was disappointed that for three hours there was nothing inspirational; informative, but nothing new. The program certainly did not highlight Fort Lee High School. I think this was a missed opportunity. The students were great! I did feel a great deal of pride and that Fort Lee was the chosen as backdrop for my "Morning Joe" fix. The graphics were gorgeous but the substance could have been enhanced by a segment w/ esteemed Fort Lee High School Professionals. As a teacher in a city (NJ/NY) where fear is escalating as teachers are discredited and blamed, the joy of teaching dies. Teachers need encouragement & respect.
FLHS

Reply

Tracy Mattei

9:46 pm on Saturday, March 3, 2012

Hi Carol! I wish too that we could hear from our own but I think that was up to the producers and directors.It is a national show and it was alot of 'nationally' recognized people (AL Sharpten, Michelle Rhee etc). Even the superman socks were requested by the director!

A thing like this is will draw national attention again!!! (the bullying Dr. Drew show too). And we will see opportunities come to our children that otherwise might not....I cannot wait to see what they will be! What a GREAT opportunity this was for the TV production class! how else would they have gotten such an opportunity??

Reply

carol simon

3:51 am on Sunday, March 4, 2012

Hi Tracy! There is no downside to having national exposure here in Fort Lee. 'Morning Joe" was exciting, educational, and always entertaining.
The unscripted Q&A (scripted?) in which Gov. Christie and Rev. Al meander around with Joe and Mika was priceless. All this, happening at the Fort Lee High School.
There is no downside for the national public exposure given to Fort Lee and the learning opportunity afforded to students by having several Governors, activists, and media celebrities "in the house," Even my own son, Aaron, was charged up by the event. It was good.

Reply

Mike R.

10:39 am on Sunday, March 4, 2012

Engravale is an arrogant self-promoter (trying to emulate his hero Christie) who had NOTHING to do with the "turnaround" of the school. He wasn't even Superintendent when the "non-tenured teachers were let go, and supervisors were laid off". And those firings had nothing to do with performance--they were people fired by the infamous Ray Bandlow because of Christie's slash-and-burn budget cuts. If anything, firing them delayed progress.

Engravale's so-called "vision" had nothing to do with the improvement--he was an second-banana assistant superintendent at the time, had no authority, and seldom even left his office. If you asked a teacher in any school what Engravale's "vision" was, and how it helped them improve scores, they would probably answer: "What vision? Until I saw him on TV, I didn't even know what the guy looked like."

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tracy Mattei

7:14 pm on Sunday, March 4, 2012

Are you a teacher in Ft Lee?

carol simon

10:47 am on Sunday, March 4, 2012

Tracy, I praise you for being an advocate for Fort Lee Schools. I appreciate your voice in these matters.
Numerous people chosen to discuss education on the show like Rev. Al, M. Rhee, Randy W., Howard Dean have platforms and are/have been heard on the airwaves. The segment with other Governors was insightful. Beyond the politics that Fort Lee Schools encounter with finding/trusting a leader ironically, Steve Engravalle, front and center deserves credit for his PR abilities. Pockets of hope, reside within the school walls and the value of educators warrant national attention in this arena.The media spins a story and neglects the "how to" raise the bar measures that succeeded within the school. Deeds rather than banter may be more powerful and significant to the Town Hall public forum. However, I am not the producer/director of "morning Joe" but I am looking for role models and solutions that are relevant to the educational process. Ironically, FLHS staff was usurped by some national figures
that dominate the stage. Great TV! I still think that a few minutes of air time with Mrs. Church and teachers would have enhanced the national stage for education that needs practical solutions and ideas.

Reply

Anna

12:09 pm on Sunday, March 4, 2012

There was certainly lots to disagree with on the program (including the lack of teacher participation--there was only one token teacher panelist), who exactly was responsible for improvementa at the school, etc. But it has definitely energized the debate, which is good. Also, Fort Lee High School was clearly meant to be the backdrop or launching pad for the show, not its central subject. The topic and the guests were directed at a national audience, and, no doubt, to showcase Gov Christie, who's a frequent guest of Morning Joe and has a relationship with all of them--and who seems to have packed the town hall with many of his own guests/supporters. Also, there was certainly exaggeration in the FLHS turnaround narrative, we all know that. Nonetheless, I still think overall it was positive for the school and the town.

Reply
Comment_arrow

William Mays

1:43 pm on Sunday, March 4, 2012

So there was exaggeration. Who cares? Its good for Fort Lee.

Jerry

1:01 pm on Sunday, March 4, 2012

Funny how the HSPA scores for the Special Education population improved and two of the non-tenured special education English teachers were let go. They both had great observations and they both coached multiple sports. So, I guess Superman was responsible for the improved test scores and the district being removed from the "watch list"?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tracy Mattei

7:16 pm on Sunday, March 4, 2012

No one person or two teachers is responsible---in any reasonable logic......

Deb Fein

1:22 pm on Sunday, March 4, 2012

Test scores in general improved. Out of One Hundred Best High Schools in New Jersey, we went from #98 to #77. All student scores have to be included under the No Child Left Behind Act. Can not comment on individual teachers being let go, do not have enough background information on that. I believe though it was Romano's choice to leave.

Reply

Alan Reeder

1:57 pm on Monday, March 5, 2012

Whatever a union does with its members' dues is the business of the union and its members. The NJEA is a democratically structured entity, if the membership doesn't like what the leadership is doing they will certainly let them know. How much does an hour-long network television puff piece cost Engrevalle and Christie? Not a cent! Is the NJEA supposed to respond to Christie's endless attacks and MSNBC's cheerleading by laying down and quitting? That is an absurd notion. The NJEA wasn't spending money on billboards when they weren't being vilified by a Governor whose every utterance is considered worthy of national broadcast. How would you respond to endless ad hominem attacks on your profession? If Engrevalle "views himself as a teacher" that doesn't make him one. If I view myself as president, that doesn't mean I'm flying Airforce One.

Reply

Tracy Mattei

2:41 pm on Monday, March 5, 2012

Alan, do you even live in Ft Lee? I am glad tat the piece didn't cost a cent, and the teachers should be asking the union to represent them, not fall into the muck of political posturing. Our teachers are awesome in Ft Lee....stop magnifying the union stuff and let them do what they do best.....teach.
As far as, Engravalle not being a teacher, have you EVER sat down with him? you will learn more about education, and reform and child development that you can imagine.

Reply
Comment_arrow

William Mays

5:57 pm on Monday, March 5, 2012

I agree, the unions are holding good teachers down and promoting bad ones. I'm sure you've read most of my posts, and you know that I don't particularly like Christie, but he is spot-on about the unions.

Comment_arrow

Mike R.

6:36 pm on Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Here's a fact check for you. The show said that the improvement came after Engravalle fired some non-tenured teachers and supervisors. In fact, the firings took place last Spring which is AFTER the tests were administered--the ones that showed all that improvement. Obviously the firings couldn't have caused the improvement. In fact, those two special ed teachers that are now gone may well have been a major cause of the rise in scores!

And Engravalle didn't fire them, Bandlow did--because of the Christie budget cuts. Mr. E. obviously can't take credit. Well, he shouldn't, but that didn't stop him from wearing the Superman socks.

As far as the anti-Christie billboards go, they were protesting the state aid cuts to school districts like Fort Lee, and seeking to get them restored.

So here's the question for you: What kind of a superintendent, who claims to do everything "for the kids" comes down on the OTHER side of that argument? In other words, what kind of a superintendent says, "Don't listen to the NJEA. Cut my state aid, force me to fire teachers and cut programs, go ahead, give the money to millionaires instead. The heck with the kids. People who want more state aid are just stupid bozos." Because that's exactly what Engravalle is saying when he gripes about the billboards.

But this year he's praising Christie for restoring a little of that aid. Maybe--at least in part--he has those so-called "stupid billboards" to thank for it.

Comment_arrow

Tracy Mattei

7:07 pm on Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Mike R--- Why do you think the Union is on the side of the kids? They don't even help the people who help the kids......why aren't they saying, let's raise the base rate of teachers salaries? or promoting merit pay? or anything constructive.....or restore the esteem of the teaching profession?
Cuts and reductions are the way of today---- nothing is going to bring back the money of the past...nothing, so if we get a half mil back, yeah I will be happy. Its better than 0!
Remember it is OUR town, go fight the good fight with Christie in your own town.....

Alan Reeder

5:16 pm on Monday, March 5, 2012

Tracy,
Responding to a nationwide campaign of attacks on public education, public school teachers, teacher's unions and the professional knowledge of experienced educators is exactly what the NJEA and other unions should be doing. What do you think your union dues should be used for? Don't forget that the "muck of political posturing" starts with a Superintendent who allows his district to serve as a staging point for Chris Christie's "reform". Perhaps if a single representative of the teacher's union were allowed to sit in and respond to these phony "town hall" attacks spending money on billboards wouldn't be necessary. A town hall by definition is an inclusive, democratic event. The Michelle Rhee, Chris Christie, Engrevalle love-fest was nothing of the sort.

Reply
Comment_arrow

William Mays

6:00 pm on Monday, March 5, 2012

Don't group school teachers and unions together. The unions only represent crappy tenured teachers who are only there because they know someone. It disgusts me to see young, good teachers laid off, while the terrible, old teachers get to stay because they have been there longer. If you listened to anything Christie said, you'd have heard that he said that he has nothing against teachers, but has everything against teachers unions. He even went as far as saying that they should be paid 200k a year.

Tracy Mattei

8:47 pm on Monday, March 5, 2012

You must be a union rep. Look, Alan, your thinking is largely emotional and lacks the fact based connections it needs to logical. I am not going to fault Engravalle for bringing a show like that here, it gave us great exposure. He is pro-child and pro-teacher, but the system is broken and needs to be fixed.
It was not a town meeting, it was a Morning with Joe, a huge TV show and that only resembles a style called the town meeting.
I want the teacher's and adminstrator's unions to scream "we need a good, live curriculum, we need support with new technology and new methodologies" not the constant back and forth with politics. What if we spent our time getting teachers what they need to so they can teach better or long or deeper and wider instead of all this muck!!
Good test score are a by-product of good teaching---- a great curriculum makes teaching great and learning greater.....

Reply
Comment_arrow

Alan Reeder

11:23 am on Wednesday, March 7, 2012

If my "thinking is largely emotional" I would like you to point out where and how so. And please do it without the excessive punctuation. I imagine you think your salary and benefits would be better were there no union collectively bargaining on your behalf. I suggest you test that theory by selling your "skill set" on the open market. There are charter schools, preps and parochials all over the state looking for teachers who can make unemotional, "fact based connections." Go for it.

Comment_arrow

William Mays

5:52 pm on Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Thats the problem Alan, the union doesn't want to bargain at all. When they refuse to bargain, do you know what happens? More layoffs than if they had bargained. So pretty much the kids lose in the end since the crappy tenured teachers get to stay, and the young ones get laid off.

Comment_arrow

Tracy Mattei

9:13 am on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Alan,
You are too defensive, too ready for the offense zingers, hence emotional. The March 3rd post, and any sentences that tells people what they think and why they think it......emotion. Nonetheless, you have some points that are valid but lost in a sea of turbulent emotion.
Why isn't the union campaigning to raise the status and public value of the teaching profession? Yes, you are teaching our children, we love our teachers but then that union comes across with drama that undermines the greatness of teachers. Perhaps a better marketing campaign to promote rather than highlight a fight with change would be better.

Jerry

7:57 am on Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Tracey, I never said the two teachers were solely responsible for the improved test scores. It is clearly a collaborative effort among the faculty, which is a great group or teachers. My point was that without tenure, good teachers are let go without good reason.

Reply

Tracy Mattei

9:22 am on Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Hi Jerry-- Thank you for clarifying that, the importance of your thought was not made clear in the last post. And it is a very important observation!

And I wholly agree that we lose some of the best teachers who are not tenured, not supported and the last to come, so the first to go.....and its a shame!!!! Its wrong and should be changed! That is a union negotiation tactic and need to end!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Alan Reeder

11:27 am on Wednesday, March 7, 2012

It would be helpful if you and Engrevalle could offer your specific insights on how to evaluate teachers. It seems you favor test scores. Is that all? Do test scores offer the best measure for teacher assessment, or would you recommend something else?

Comment_arrow

Tracy Mattei

8:57 am on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Alan--
I have never heard any of the forums state that tests are the best measure of a teacher's ability to be successful. However, it the only objective measure we have right now. Do I think it should be 30% of the 'grade' so to speak, yes, becasue what matters, as you know is the other 70%. That other is where true learning occurs and that is where we get the kids ready to be tested.....
What the teachers should be asking is what kind of support are we going to get to be able to do this? Where is the curriculum, where are the supplies etc....not fight so much against the current, its exhausting and you deserve more support than what is here!

Deb Fein

11:55 am on Wednesday, March 7, 2012

The results of standardized tests are not conclusive for all If you are talking about the children, some are not good test takers. Others may not have slept well the night before or had a good breakfast which plays into test performance. As an educator myself, for both teachers and students, the results of standardized tests should be balanced with other formative and summative assessments throughout the school year. Also, there is something such as teacher observation, both planned and unplanned in advance by the Principal! How many letters does the teacher have in her file showing appreciation for teachers efforts or not?

Reply

Ava

1:44 am on Saturday, March 10, 2012

I don't know why teachers are getting such a bad rap. We teach your children, worry about their well being, deal with emotional issues, family problems, teaching new and creative lessons, trying to use technology in the classroom (even though rarely works), and many other things but yet we don't deserve our benefits. Tenure doesn't mean you cannot get fired, it just means that the administrators have to prove that the teacher is ineffective. If you want to know who is an effective teacher and who isn't ask your kids, if they say a teacher doesn't teach then call your best friend Engravalle and have him observe the teacher. While the unions are crazy at times, their heart is in the right place. They support the teachers and staff, if their is proof that a teacher is ineffective then get rid of them, its not impossible. Go ahead, get rid of tenure, it won't affect the good teachers. The problem is when an administrator has a friend or relative that needs a job it is going to be your good teacher that goes. I'm sure Engravelle is great but he has yet to show it. He has been here for 2 years and is taking credit for everything. If he wanted to be a teacher he would still be in the classroom. Someone that is a teacher for 3 years does not consider themselves a teacher. First yr teachers need practice in order to grow, not by being an admin. People who go into admin usually want out of the classroom and more pay. They dont deal with the students like the teachers do.

Reply

Ava

1:52 am on Saturday, March 10, 2012

I also don't understand how he can evaluate schools, students, and teachers without stepping foot in the classrooms or schools. How can he know how to make our schools better if he doesn't know what they are like to begin with? If he was present and then making these statements than it would be a different story. I am not saying administrators don't care for the kids because they do, but you cannot tell someone how to teach until you know the full story. You don't always have a classroom that is full of kids eager to learn but you try to peak their interest and keep them entertained for the entire day. It is an extremely hard job and people treat us like glorified babysitters that do nothing but whine. We are overpaid, lazy, heroes. Make up your minds!

Reply

Tracy Mattei

8:52 am on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Ava, Rick- your judgments are based on a snapshot of the FL school system, snapshot of education and the expanded assumptions are tenuous and emotional. There is not one aspect of the show that explains the whole 'picture'. The superintendent is not a teacher's direct report, the administrators are. The Superintendent relies on them to do their jobs. Just as any other industry relies on the chain of command.
I think you are disrespecting yourself as a teacher by trying to negate someone's belief that they remain a teacher. I will also challenge the fact that only teachers who want out of the classroom (that is just silly) and want more money go into administration. They want more, yes, but they want more so they have more influence over a greater number of children. And if they want out- then there a many other industries available, just like any other job.
There is one difference I have never been able to wrap my head around, education is the ONLY profession that will dare to publicly insult, and challenge their bosses, without fear of consequence and a sense of entitlement that is misplaced and misused. Good teachers teach, they teach well in the worst circumstances and teach for the love of teaching.....its rewards are greater than its challenges.
The focus should be education and getting the best out of our kids.....get the schools back on track....

Reply
Comment_arrow

Alan Reeder

11:18 am on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Tracy,
I'm beginning to understand now. The issue for you is respect for authority. It bothers you that the NJEA runs ads that antagonize the Governor. It also upsets you that public school teachers, because they have the due process protections of tenure and contracts, are able to "challenge their bosses, without fear of consequence..." This presupposes that anyone who has power should be respected by those who have less power and to not do so derives from a sense of "entitlement." What you are suggesting is that teachers, with years of knowledge and experience should follow the chain of command and not challenge anyone who has been granted title and authority greater than their own. I couln't disagree more. I believe in a workplace where the professional knowledge of experienced teachers is seen as a resource for collaboration and cooperation. A blind loyalty to power and the corporate chain of command is essentially hostile to that notion and therefore incompatible. We really don't need to discuss this further as it would be impossible for me to reconcile my democratic view with your authoritarian one.

Comment_arrow

William Mays

1:10 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Experience means nothing Alan, experienced teachers could be just as bad as inexperienced ones, but the difference is that it takes longer to get rid of them. I was reading some article on a teacher in NYC that assaulted a student and she was put into a administrative position for 6 months until they can fire her.

Comment_arrow

Tracy Mattei

8:30 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Alan,Emotional thought is your thing huh? I don't mind it, everything has its value, I have made it very clear that I think the union should spend money elsewhere. I will expand the thought for you, they need to spend money elsewhere and not pour more gas on a already out of control fire, it looks poor and alienates much of the private sector workers. No I do not think representatives from the unions should be coming to BOE mtgs, running their agenda about politics. No where can you get away with talking to your bosses in that manner. I would like the union to campaign for what teachers need, if that is done, it can undermine and weaken some of the political turmoil. I am talking about a different level of strategy that what you are, perhaps that is where we differ so greatly. Antagonizing the opponent just makes for a greater fight----they need to be smarter than the opponent, strategic answers, not muck. Why do you bring up teachers, teaching practices into the union business? Teachers are where its good, the union, its leaders are in a fight with the governor.
Oh please if you know what I do around town, you would know I am about the greater good and always getting myself in trouble with people who are of authority.
My only blind loyalty is to the the children of Ft Lee...Do you understand that both my husband and I are educators? I am a second career, my husband a teacher turned administrator.How can a person be authoritarian and have issue for respect for authority?

Fortleehudsonliving

10:48 am on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Tracy,
What is your opinion about an administrator calling a former education supervisor a "Bozo" on national TV? Is that disrespectful? Does Fort Lee deserve better?

Reply
Comment_arrow

William Mays

1:07 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Maybe he was a bozo. Its funny when people want honesty out of a person and when they get it, they complain.

Comment_arrow

Tracy Mattei

8:33 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

I did tell him what I thought. What I think is we need a straight shooter, no nonsense, willing to go out on a limb to get what we need and make change leader......not a union guy, not a charming suit.

Alan Reeder

1:21 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Billy Mays,
Would you prefer a surgeon two years out of med school or a surgeon with ten years experience and 100 similar surgeries under her belt?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tracy Mattei

8:40 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Can that be any worse of an analogy Alan?

I had three low spine surgeries, first with a Doctor had 20 years experience, the next with ten and the third with three........I can walk today because of that (by your terms) 'inexperienced' doctor understood the spine and the new methodologies.

You should never discount youth to mean incompetence----sometimes they see how situations are different in the current world..........

Comment_arrow

Alan Reeder

11:32 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Tracy,
Sorry about your back, and I am glad to hear you can walk today. Any chance those surgeries were paid for with health benefits collectively bargained by the teacher's union?

Comment_arrow

Tracy Mattei

10:11 am on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Alan, no, car accident insurance.....

Comment_arrow

Alan Reeder

1:47 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Billy,
It is true that teacher isn't a surgeon but a teacher is a professional. As in any profession there are skills that develop with experience. If the surgeon example doesn't work for you how about a contractor? Lawyer? Plumber? Personal trainer? Home health aid? Or do you think teaching is unskilled labor? The point being that if we remove tenure and seniority in this difficult economic climate, why wouldn't a district lay off every teacher that is at the top of the pay scale? Older teachers cost more in health benefits as well, would it not be tempting to cut them loose for that reason also? To suggest that experience is meaningless defies all logic, evidence, and experience.

Deb Fein

2:43 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Tracy: Amen to your first comment of today!

Reply

Deb Fein

2:50 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Rick: If you'd like a parent's point of view, the improvement at Fort Lee High School, both test scores and other increases in knowledge, are more a reflection of Mrs. Church's influence than anyone else's.

Reply

Deb Fein

10:05 am on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Alan: That's a really low blow to Tracy. Have you worked at a job without benefits? I can tell you from personal experience its a horror, and the employees help to pay for those benefits as well.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tracy Mattei

10:17 am on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Thanks Deb. No need to worry about Alan, he is just a non-Fort Lee resident frustrated union rep....if he understood that life does exist outside of his world, he would not ask such nonsense.
It was paid for by car accident insurance.....eish.....maybe that is where he should use his talents---- go fix that industry ;)

Comment_arrow

Alan Reeder

1:39 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

How is it a low blow? I have been called "emotional" without any textual evidence to support this assertion and chose to ignore it. I expressed my sypathy and well-wishes after Tracy raised the issue of her multiple surgeries. I have read numerous attacks on the teacher's union and thus it is absolutely relevant to inquire as to whether those medical bills were covered by her union negotiated benefits. When you reduce the role of unions to some abstract evil it is the obligation of those who know otherwise to point out these inconsistencies.

Deb Fein

2:10 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Alan: It is a low blow because if Tracy is a teacher she helps to pay in for those health benefits. This is the same as an employer paying a percentage and the employee the rest. Those of us without insurance have suffered tremendously. How would you like paying off three emergency rooms as my husband and I are doing? It's not a pretty picture.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Alan Reeder

3:50 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

I agree, it isn't a pretty picture but Is your lack of health insurance somehow my fault? I have been a lifelong supporter of single payer nationalized health insurance. Have you? Employers are not obliged to provide benefits and up to this point neither is the government. Those who have benefits more often than not are union. Why is that? It is because they used their organized collective bargaining power to negotiate benefits. I am sorry you don't share in these benefits and I will continue to support any political party or candidate that promotes the extension of these benefits or Medicare for all. I am also willing to pay higher income taxes in order to help folks like you get coverage. What I will not support is continued subsidies to unregulated, for-profit health insurance companies that parasitically skim profits and cut coverage and ration quality care. Where do you stand? Where does Christie stand? Where does your anti-union Superintendent stand?

Tracy Mattei

2:20 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Alan- you have created the attacks....have you read your own words? ugh! Go back to your own town, we will take care of our Ft Lee teachers, they don't need the likes of you representing them!
Out for now, can't take the banter any longer!

Reply

Deb Fein

4:40 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Alan. alan: you are using this column as some kind of platform to espouse your views. However, do you have health insurance on your job? it should be a right to all, and yes, i was in favor of a single payer option. employers do not have to give it, but its ironic in a lazy economy that bosses get all the profits and employees have to be happy just to have a job. They are preyed upon. The End.

Reply

Leave a comment